

More than your usual Crichton
Better than Timeline, well thought out and a precis of environmental issues and global warming in specific. An informative and enjoyable work of fiction, even if a departure from the usual Crichton fare. Prompted me to check out some of the references and discover more about the topic – any good book should make you interested enough to learn more about a given topic, going beyond what is commonly available (and it is surprising that on something like the environment I have been doing just that, relying on others opinions instead of informing myself and forming my own). Many things in this book challenge accepted theories, but one I already was aware of, namely that all administrations, be they government or foundations will fight for survival and perpetuating themselves, even if it means being at counter- purpose with their stated goal and ambition. Crichton provides an overview of the environmentalist movement, environmental policies and eco-terrorism in an good read weaving fact and fiction that is thought-provoking and speaks out against the “state of fear” we all live in. The ‘monologue’ by one of the characters on this topic (ecology of thought and explanation for the title) was particularly interesting. I also enjoyed Kenner and his quick perspectives on environmental issues (the overview of Yellowstone’s history for ex.) as well as his challenges to the scientific leeway we as general public allow environmental concerns, as compared with that given to NASA. The character correctly underlines the smugness of many ‘concerned’ citizens and their eagerness to do something for the environment, as long as it does not impinge on their comfort/lifestyle (I do consider myself concerned, I just don’t like the hypocrisy I often notice in the rhetoric and the dialectic). I don’t know enough about environmental science to judge the use of footnotes citing exact case studies and journals, but I do know research is often biased by the need for continued financing. I do agree with the author on problems posed by the “precautionary principle” and particularly like the concluding outline for a new type of environmental foundation.. one that is objective and accountable in all areas of its’ work and administration. Makes a good case for the need for unbiased, double- blind studies and program implementation, as well as for research that is “blind-to-financing”. Much has been said in the press about the use of footnotes (a growing trend in novels?) and the author’s personal outline of his opinions and bibliography, but I found it useful on such a subject. Most people will probably prefer the movie that I am sure will soon be made of this book.